Skip to main content

Robinson Crusoe: Thoughts

The isolation and containment experienced in Robinson Crusoe is terrifyingly delightful for a reader. At one hand, the novel itself is an interesting take on colonialism: the protagonist literally colonizes the island in order to survive. On the other hand, I think it's a novel about identity and self discovery in a moment of pure crisis. Several themes emerge through the text: isolation, colonization, survivalism,  religious exploration (or rediscovery is perhaps a better term), etc.

The story itself has remained a literary classic. It has been told countless times and in many different forms. Hollywood has always had a fascination with the story: several film productions have been made; more recently, Cast Away (starring Tom Hanks) has taken up the story and reintroduced it into the public consciousness.

This leads me to a question: what is it about Robinson Crusoe that remains so fresh and desirable to the public?

I think one of the many appeals of the novel is that it is fundamentally about overcoming internal conflict. There's this aspect of the story that is entirely psychological: the situation, itself, is far removed from the norms of possibility; and yet, it is entirely a realistic possibility. Robinson Crusoe (the character) is very much a heroic account of masculinity. He is conqueror, emperor, and master (in terms of his position towards Friday). Yet Crusoe is also the embodied representation of the ideal Christian: he overcomes his hardships and manages to create and forges a real home on the island. After his religious conversion, the way he sees the world is changed. Quite literally, Crusoe becomes Adam. With the introduction of Friday, we see naming and western education. The two, together, I think, incorporate the idea of Adam and Eve, and further develop the religious notion already underway in earlier text.

His relationship to the Friday also suggests some elements of homoeroticism (though the concept isn't really explored in depth; the question concerning love is something I'd like to think more about). Loneliness and dread of separation become apparent. The friendship that emerges between the two fundamentally creates the social element of the novel. When Friday's father returns, things are set in motion which lead to Crusoe's escape off of the island and return to English society.

The return itself isn't all that satisfying, and I don't think it's all that satisfying for Crusoe, either. Back amongst the English, he exhibits signs of boredom and depression.  This leads him to further travel, suggesting that Crusoe can never really be reintegrated into society.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evelina: Identity and Observation

Frances Burney's Evelina is a delightful read. There, I said it! I actually really like an 18th century novel! Like much of what we've read this semester, the text is written as a series of letters (epistolary novel) from a series of different voices / perspectives. The earliest letters regard the background to Evelina's situation. One of the themes that develops in these early letters regards identity / social position. At the heart of Evelina's confusion / search for identity, lie her background and rearing under the guise of her "father", Mr. Villars. In these first letters, we are giving a generational backstory suggesting of a place of prominence for Evelina (her mother, after all, was a Lady). The death of her mother and then the death of her father leave Evelina to Mr. Villars, where he does his upmost to educate her and teach her to lead a mild mannered / virtuous / pious life. We don't really get many details of her formal education (save that ...

I. Seductive Forms and the Progression of the Novel

I am no authority to speak on behalf of the development of the novel, but regarding the various theories presented in the first chapter of Ballaster’s Seductive Forms , I can only conclude that reason and logic would seem to indicate a preference for Michael McKeon’s theory / understanding of the development of the novel as form and object.  Ballaster does a wonderful job at expressing the weaknesses of theories presented by Watt, Davis, and others within the formalism / historicism/ hybrid theory debate. When reviewing these theories, I struggled to grasp the complexity of some of these narratives. I also struggled with what appeared to be a lack of basic logic in terms of the progression of structure and device. The historicists seem to ignore or undervalue the progression of literary tradition. The formalists seem to forget that every writer, regardless of position or gender, are people living in a given time; that as individuals who exert themselves as writers of the pag...

Gallagher: a Criticism

"No feature of the novel seems to be more obvious and yet easily ignored than its fictionality." - Gallagher, "Rise of Fictionality", pg. 336. First, a obvious observation, regarding the term "fictionality": Gallagher's paper does the term a great injustice, because at no point is the term clearly and concisely defined. In many ways, it feels like we're reading abstractions without any need for abstraction. Gallagher's article/chapter (not sure which) doesn't necessarily or fundamentally (in my humble opinion) offer a truly sound argument as to the "discovery" of "fictionality". There are several arguments that are made, including one particularly troubling to me: writers turned to "fictionality" in order to avoid prosecution (My concern about this statement relies fundamentally on the fact that very clear and obvious fictions existed to the world far before any author ever turned to this sort of thought. ...